Schnittstellen, an denen Integration stattfindet (Integrations-Schnittstellen)ĥ. Typological vs. We also provide some secondary dimensions to consider when constructing a mixed methods design (Johnson and Christensen 2017). These characteristics are discussed below. As shown in Table 1, the following primary design “dimensions” are emphasized in this article: purpose of mixing, theoretical drive, timing, point of integration, typological use, and degree of complexity. In this article, this notation system is used in some depth.Ī mixed methods design as a product has several primary characteristics that should be considered during the design process. Note that each research tradition receives an equal number of letters (four) in its abbreviation for equity. As discussed below, plus (+) signs refer to concurrent implementation of components (“gleichzeitige Durchführung der Teilstudien” or “paralleles Mixed Methods-Design”) and arrows (→) refer to sequential implementation (“Sequenzielle Durchführung der Teilstudien” or “sequenzielles Mixed Methods-Design”) of components. In a commonly used mixed methods notation system (Morse 1991), the components are indicated as qual and quan (or QUAL and QUAN to emphasize primacy), respectively, for qualitative and quantitative research. Mixed methods research (“Mixed Methods” or “MM”) is the sibling of multimethod research (“Methodenkombination”) in which either solely multiple qualitative approaches or solely multiple quantitative approaches are combined. Mixed methods research is the type of research in which a researcher or team of researchers combines elements of qualitative and quantitative research approaches (e. g., use of qualitative and quantitative viewpoints, data collection, analysis, inference techniques) for the broad purposes of breadth and depth of understanding and corroboration. For the purpose of this article, we use the following definition of mixed methods research (Johnson et al. A mixed methods design is characterized by the combination of at least one qualitative and one quantitative research component. Obeying these rules is not a guarantee of a strong design, but it does contribute to it. To obtain a strong design as a product, one needs to carefully consider a number of rules for designing as an activity. In mixed methods design, both meanings are relevant. The result of designing as a verb is a mixed methods design as a noun (in German: “das Forschungsdesign” or “Design”), as it has, for example, been described in a journal article. Another meaning is that of a product, namely the result of designing. Someone can be engaged in designing a study (in German: “eine Studie konzipieren” or “eine Studie designen”). One meaning focuses on the process of design in this meaning, design is often used as a verb. The word “design” has at least two distinct meanings in mixed methods research (Maxwell 2013). This article addresses the process of selecting and constructing mixed methods research (MMR) designs.

Im design 360